|
|

The
stakes in the e-systems
Marcel BOURGEOIS, Conseiller en organisation,
Versailles, France
 |
Marcel
BOURGEOIS hold an Engineer Diploma from the "Institut des Arts
et Métiers- Lille" (1952) and a Master of Sciences in
Management from the MIT (1960).
He worked as engineer in hydraulics from 1956 to 1962.
From 1962 to 1967 he was director at the Centre Français
de Recherche Opérationnelle.
Since 1968 he was consultant in Operations research, organisation
systems, information systems and management.
From 1967 to 1973 he was professor at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes
Commerciales (HEC - Paris) and built a cursus in Strategic Management
and Organisation systems..
From 1973 to 1978 he was professor at the Centre de Formation Supérieure
au Management.
In 1982 he created METSI a Software Engineering company of which
he was the CEO until 1992.
From 1978 to 1985 he was founder chairman of the non-profit-making
organisation Groupes d'Etude des Systèmes.
He was visiting professor at the University of Namur and at the
University of Grenoble 2.
During his professional activity his research interest was the area
of Organisation systems. His currently research interest is the
criticism of modern and post-modern mentality. |
| Abstract |
| Probably,
it is not exaggerated to think information technologies will produce
strong disruptions in our societies, disruptions analog by their
importance to those of the industrial revolution. But it is not
appropriate to speak of information society by comparison to the
industrial society. We are living in a world where the Society is
broken up more and more in different and autonomous spheres : the
spheres of technology, economics, capitalism and politics. For each
of these spheres the information technologies and their application
in the e-systems are a stake. The purpose of the paper is to analyse
how these spheres and their interactions have an impact on the content
of these e-systems and on their role in the Society: the paper will
try to identify the deep stakes in the e-systems hidden behind so
many ideological and technocratic speeches. |
|